Wyoming State Water Plan, Wyoming Water Development Office
Rafting on Snake River Lake Marie, Snowy Mountains Wyoming Wind River Range picture

Bear River Basin Water Plan
Technical Memoranda

SUBJECT: Appendix D
Key Structures and Diversions
V.H. CANAL DIVERSION

PREPARED BY: Bear River Basin Planning Team

DATE: August 7, 2000



Diversion Description:The V.H. Canal headgate is an all steel structure with a 42-inch rectangular gate. Water is permanently ponded upstream of the structure.
Pine Creek upstream of V.H. Canal diversion
Diversion Location: The V.H. Canal Diversion is the second highest diversion on Pine Creek, tributary of Smiths Fork, tributary to the Bear River. See location map hereafter.

Latitude   N 42° 06' 10.4"
Longitude   W 110° 51' 05.0"

Conveyance Description: Open channel canal, approximately 10,560 feet in length.1

Direct Flow Water Rights:2

Priority Date Permit
Number
Permitted Use Permitted
Acres
Flow
(CFS)
Cumulative
(CFS)
Comments
07-10-1905 6811 Irrigation, Domestic, Storage 640 9.14 9.14 Decreed Futile Call
04-06-1910 2211E Irrigation 143.24 2.19
Decreed Futile Call
06-11-1915 3226E Irrigation, Domestic, Storage 133.45 1.90 1.90


click to enlarge

Associated Storage Rights: None

Irrigation Practices: Land is irrigated using circular pivots sprinklers. Less than 10% is flood irrigated.3

Estimated Diversion Efficiency:

Calculated Diversion Efficiency = Conveyance Efficiency X Application Efficiency:
Conveyance Efficiency: 55%
Application Efficiency: 85%
Overall Diversion Efficiency: 47%

Conveyance efficiency is estimated by total length of main canal. Application efficiency for flood irrigation and sprinkler irrigation is estimated at 55% and 85% respectively.

Crop Types / Consumptive Use: The primary crop irrigated from this canal is alfalfa.3

Return Flows: Return flow is primarily captured by Sublette Creek and/or downstream diversions.

The following return flow pattern was adopted for modeling in this study are as follows:

	
		Month
      (after initial Diversion)	 Percent of Return
		0			50%
		1			25%
		2			15%
                3                       10%
                                       100%
		

Other Operational Information: Surface flows in Pine Creek tend to disappear into the ground by mid-July when diverting. Pine Creek was decreed a “futile call” by the courts, and as a result it is not regulated for the benefit of more senior water rights on Smiths Fork. There are only two irrigators taking water directly from Pine Creek.

References:

  1. USDA -Soil Conservation Service Economic Research Service-Forest Service in Cooperation with the States of Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Irrigation Conveyance Systems, Working Paper for the Bear River Basin Type IV Study, Idaho-Utah-Wyoming, April 1976

  2. Water rights summary obtained from State Engineer Interstate Reglist - revised April 14, 1999

  3. Irrigation practices based on field investigation and interview with Mr. Kevin Wilde, Hydrographer / Commissioner - November 30, 1999.

  4. State of Utah Natural Resources, Water Budget Studies - Utah, Bear River Study Area, September 1994.


Monthly Diversion Records
V.H. Canal (on Pine Creek)

YEAR MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
1970 196 6.3 388.8 240 8.0 476.0 258 8.3 511.7 243 7.8 482.0 160 5.3 317.4
1971 330 10.6 654.5 349 11.6 692.2 349 11.3 692.2 341 11.0 676.4 306 10.2 606.9
1972 12 0.4 23.8 375 12.5 743.8 370 11.9 733.9 297 9.6 589.1 289 9.6 573.2
1973 0 0.0 0.0 296 9.9 587.1 325 10.5 644.6 290 9.4 575.2 91 3.0 180.5
1974 220 7.1 436.4 366 12.2 726.0 328 10.6 650.6 279 9.0 553.4 270 9.0 535.5
1975 103 3.3 204.3 318 10.6 630.7 374 12.1 741.8 280 9.0 555.4 240 8.0 476.0
1976 185 6.0 366.9 337 11.2 668.4 331 10.7 656.5 343 11.1 680.3 86 2.9 170.6
1977 279 9.0 553.4 240 8.0 476.0 235 7.6 466.1 217 7.0 430.4 120 4.0 238.0
1978 311 10.0 616.9 278 9.3 551.4 317 10.2 628.8 350 11.3 694.2 154 5.1 305.5
1979 0 0.0 0.0 304 10.1 603.0 300 9.7 595.0 307 9.9 608.9 0 0.0 0.0
1980 208 6.7 412.6 475 15.8 942.1 447 14.4 886.6 326 10.5 646.6 341 11.4 676.4
1981 215 6.9 426.4 276 9.2 547.4 294 9.5 583.1 295 9.5 585.1 198 6.6 392.7
1982 326 10.5 646.6 409 13.6 811.2 343 11.1 680.3 332 10.7 658.5 363 12.1 720.0
1983 279 9.0 553.4 515 17.2 1021.5 328 10.6 650.6 443 14.3 878.7 238 7.9 472.1
1984 139 4.5 275.7 392 13.1 777.5 414 13.4 821.2 421 13.6 835.0 251 8.4 497.9
1985 130 4.2 257.9 414 13.8 821.2 391 12.6 775.5 456 14.7 904.5 434 14.5 860.8
1986 165 5.3 327.3 402 13.4 797.4 352 11.4 698.2 506 16.3 1003.6 157 5.2 311.4
1987 282 9.1 559.3 276 9.2 547.4 348 11.2 690.2 339 10.9 672.4 85 2.8 168.6
1988 53 1.7 105.1 330 11.0 654.5 325 10.5 644.6 313 10.1 620.8 165 5.5 327.3
1989 268 8.6 531.6 250 8.3 495.9 248 8.0 491.9 248 8.0 491.9 240 8.0 476.0
1990 255 8.2 505.8 284 9.5 563.3 240 7.7 476.0 164 5.3 325.3 0 0.0 0.0
1991 178 5.7 353.1 359 12.0 712.1 330 10.6 654.5 259 8.4 513.7 168 5.6 333.2
1992 243 7.8 482.0 270 9.0 535.5 81 2.6 160.7 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
1993 103 3.3 204.3 299 10.0 593.1 289 9.3 573.2 276 8.9 547.4 132 4.4 261.8
1994 119 3.8 236.0 293 9.8 581.2 282 9.1 559.3 314 10.1 622.8 234 7.8 464.1
1995 498 16.1 987.8 366 12.2 726.0 225 7.3 446.3 320 10.3 634.7 318 10.6 630.7
1996 138 4.5 273.7 406 13.5 805.3 395 12.7 783.5 465 15.0 922.3 376 12.5 745.8
1997 251.9 8.1 499.6 343.6 11.5 681.5 287.6 9.3 570.4 409.4 13.2 812.0 377.7 12.6 749.2
1998 313.3 10.1 621.4 410.4 13.7 814.0 329.1 10.6 652.8 359.3 11.6 712.7 235.4 7.8 466.9

AVERAGES
6.5 396.7
11.3 675.3
10.2 624.8
10.2 628.7
6.9 412.4


To the Bear River Basin Water Plan