Wyoming State Water Plan, Wyoming Water Development Office
Rafting on Snake River Lake Marie, Snowy Mountains Wyoming Wind River Range picture

Bear River Basin Water Plan
Technical Memoranda

SUBJECT: Appendix D
Key Structures and Diversions
ALONZO F. SIGHTS DIVERSION

PREPARED BY: Bear River Basin Planning Team

DATE: August 7, 2000



Diversion Description: The Alonzo F. Sights diversion structure consists of a concrete chute with wing walls and a 65-inch wide steel slide gate.
Alonzo F. Sights headgate structure
Diversion Location: The diversion is located on the Bear River downstream of the Smiths Fork confluence. The headgate is located about 100 yards downstream of the actual diversion. Water is carried to the headgate across existing railroad tracks through a culvert. The Diversion is regulated as part of the Central Division of the Bear River Compact. See location map hereafter.

Latitude   N 42° 08' 06.8"
Longitude   W 110° 58' 21.5"

Conveyance Description: Open channel ditch, approximately 15,840 feet in length.1

Direct Flow Water Rights:2

Priority Date Permit
Number
Permitted Use Permitted
Acres
Flow
(CFS)
Cumulative
(CFS)
Comments
05-30-1884 Terr Irrigation 97 1.38 1.38
05-30-1884 Terr Irrigation, Storage 250 3.57 4.95
05-30-1884 Terr Irrigation, Storage 227 3.24 8.19
01-11-1954 5721E Irrigation, Storage 33 0.47 8.66 George Bourne - Garret Springs (Non-Compact tributary - deducted from compact accounting.)


click to enlarge

Associated Storage Rights: None

Irrigation Practices: Irrigation practices are mixed (Approx. 60% flood irrigation, 40% hand line sprinklers & side rolls).3

Estimated Diversion Efficiency:

Calculated Diversion Efficiency = Conveyance Efficiency X Application Efficiency:
Conveyance Efficiency: 65%
Application Efficiency: 65%
Overall Diversion Efficiency: 42%

Conveyance efficiency is estimated by total length of main canal. Application efficiency for flood irrigation and sprinkler irrigation is estimated at 55% and 85% respectively.

Crop Types / Consumptive Use: Approximately 40% of the irrigated acreage is alfalfa and grains (primarily oats). The remainder of the acreage is meadow grasses.3

Return Flows: Return flow is primarily captured the Oscar E. Snyder Ditch (approx. 50%) and the Cook Brothers Ditch (approx. 50%).

The following return flow pattern was adopted for modeling in this study are as follows:

	
		Month
      (after initial Diversion)	 Percent of Return
		0			70%
		1			20%
		2			10%
                3                        0%
                                       100%
		

References:

  1. USDA -Soil Conservation Service Economic Research Service-Forest Service in Cooperation with the States of Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Irrigation Conveyance Systems, Working Paper for the Bear River Basin Type IV Study, Idaho-Utah-Wyoming, April 1976

  2. Water rights summary obtained from State Engineer Interstate Reglist - revised April 14, 1999

  3. Irrigation practices based on field investigation and interview with Mr. Kevin Wilde, Hydrographer / Commissioner - November 30, 1999.

  4. State of Utah Natural Resources, Water Budget Studies - Utah, Bear River Study Area, September 1994.


Monthly Diversion Records
Alonzo F. Sights

YEAR MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
Total of Daily Ave for Month Average
CFS
Monthly Total
Ac-Ft
1970 11 0.4 21.8 268 8.9 531.6 320 10.3 634.7 143 4.6 283.6 0 0.0 0.0
1971 1229 39.6 2437.7 1284 42.8 2546.8 432 13.9 856.9 105 3.4 208.3 15 0.5 29.8
1972 612 19.7 1213.9 1890 63.0 3748.8 200 6.5 396.7 304 9.8 603.0 36 1.2 71.4
1973 79 2.5 156.7 462 15.4 916.4 470 15.2 932.2 132 4.3 261.8 0 0.0 0.0
1974 413 13.3 819.2 696 23.2 1380.5 392 12.6 777.5 213 6.9 422.5 20 0.7 39.7
1975 0 0.0 0.0 327 10.9 648.6 138 4.5 273.7 113 3.6 224.1 2 0.1 4.0
1976 0 0.0 0.0 192 6.4 380.8 412 13.3 817.2 784 25.3 1555.0 0 0.0 0.0
1977 202 6.5 400.7 216 7.2 428.4 175 5.6 347.1 2 0.1 4.0 0 0.0 0.0
1978 148 4.8 293.6 567 18.9 1124.6 504 16.3 999.7 119 3.8 236.0 0 0.0 0.0
1979 404 13.0 801.3 471 15.7 934.2 323 10.4 640.7 28 0.9 55.5 0 0.0 0.0
1980 447 14.4 886.6 693 23.1 1374.5 360 11.6 714.0 35 1.1 69.4 116 3.9 230.1
1981 223 7.2 442.3 445 14.8 882.6 450 14.5 892.6 28 0.9 55.5 9 0.3 17.9
1982 1683 54.3 3338.2 1245 41.5 2469.4 328 10.6 650.6 14 0.5 27.8 73 2.4 144.8
1983 2 0.1 4.0 2783 92.8 5520.0 118 3.8 234.0 21 0.7 41.7 0 0.0 0.0
1984 990 31.9 1963.6 2482 82.7 4923.0 448 14.5 888.6 12 0.4 23.8 0 0.0 0.0
1985 0 0.0 0.0 216 7.2 428.4 206 6.6 408.6 107 3.5 212.2 130 4.3 257.9
1986 0 0.0 0.0 168 5.6 333.2 314 10.1 622.8 246 7.9 487.9 0 0.0 0.0
1987 291 9.4 577.2 283 9.4 561.3 242 7.8 480.0 68 2.2 134.9 0 0.0 0.0
1988 11 0.4 21.8 809 27.0 1604.6 268 8.6 531.6 275 8.9 545.5 42 1.4 83.3
1989 104 3.4 206.3 596 19.9 1182.1 614 19.8 1217.9 224 7.2 444.3 0 0.0 0.0
1990 32 1.0 63.5 207 6.9 410.6 266 8.6 527.6 256 8.3 507.8 23 0.8 45.6
1991 125 4.0 247.9 285 9.5 565.3 272 8.8 539.5 267 8.6 529.6 147 4.9 291.6
1992 279 9.0 553.4 270 9.0 535.5 279 9.0 553.4 118 3.8 234.0 0 0.0 0.0
1993 202 6.5 400.7 718 23.9 1424.1 504 16.3 999.7 151 4.9 299.5 96 3.2 190.4
1994 283 9.1 561.3 283 9.4 561.3 274 8.8 543.5 28 0.9 55.5 18 0.6 35.7
1995 266 8.6 527.6 672 22.4 1332.9 362 11.7 718.0 106 3.4 210.2 0 0.0 0.0
1996 211 6.8 418.5 786 26.2 1559.0 475 15.3 942.1 0 0.0 0.0 282 9.4 559.3
1997 75.1 2.4 149.0 434.2 14.5 861.2 545.1 17.6 1081.2 240.7 7.8 477.4 14 0.5 27.8
1998 87.5 2.8 173.6 69.6 2.3 138.0 465.8 15.0 923.9 98.7 3.2 195.8 0 0.0 0.0

AVERAGES
9.4 575.2
22.8 1355.4
11.3 694.7
4.7 289.9
1.2 70.0


To the Bear River Basin Water Plan