Snake/Salt River Basin Plan - Major Streams

Metadata also available as

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

    Title: Snake/Salt River Basin Plan - Major Streams
    Abstract:
    Hydrographic features for Wyoming at 1:100,000-scale, including perennial and intermittent designations and Strahler stream order attributes for streams. Does not include man-made ditches, canals and aqueducts. The data was originally produced by USGS, a Digital Line Graph (DLG) product, though this product was enhanced (edgematched, some linework and attributes corrected, stream order attribute added). A subset of this dataset is also available for distribution, including only major streams (order 4 to 7) and major lakes and reservoirs. In order to reduce the size of this subset, the line segments were dissolved to remove unncessary segments. Both datasets are available in Arc export file and shapefile format for download (see Onlink_Linkage) Statewide and tiled data: there is one export file, which when imported into ARC/INFO, will contain one coverage with both polygon (lakes, reservoirs) and line (streams) topology and two feature attribute files (.PAT and .AAT) along with three additional attribute files containing descriptive information. In shapefile format, there will be two shapefiles (polygons and lines separated), with all attribute files in Dbase format.

  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Analysis, Wyoming Gap , 1996, Snake/Salt River Basin Plan - Major Streams: Spatial Data and Visualization Center, Laramie, Wyoming.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -111.048958
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -109.972511
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 44.355472
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 42.508370

  3. What does it look like?

    <URL:http://www.sdvc.uwyo.edu/images/hydro.gif>hydro.gif (GIF)
    example of perennial and intermittent hydrography

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: unknown
    Currentness_Reference: publication date of the source data, USGS DLGs

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):

      • String (3103)
      • String (93623)
      • GT-polygon composed of chains (12131)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.000000. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.000000. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927.
      The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.400000.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.978698.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    streams_ssdd27
    contains codes for line hydrographic features (Source: n/a)

    FID
    Internal feature number. (Source: ESRI)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:50

    Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.

    Shape
    Feature geometry. (Source: ESRI)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Arc (line) feature codes
    Codeset Source:USGS DLG data user guide, also see attached file, HYDRODLG.LINE

    Coordinates defining the features.

    FNODE_
    Identifies Strahler stream order (Source: Wyoming Gap Analysis Project)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:7

    TNODE_

    LPOLY_

    RPOLY_

    LENGTH

    WY_STRM_

    WY_STRM_ID

    MINOR1

    DLGMINOR2

    HYDRONAME

    SOURCE

    HYDRODLG.PAT
    contains code for polygon hydrographic features (Source: n/a)

    MAJOR 1-4
    Identifies DLG lines for hydrography (Source: USGS DLG data user guide)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:50

    MINOR 1-4
    Identifies different hydrographic polygon codes (Source: USGS DLG data user guide)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Polygon feature codes
    Codeset Source:USGS DLG data user guide, also see attached file, HYDRODLG.POLY

    HYDRODLG.LINE
    contains definitions of arc hydrographic feature codes (Source: n/a)

    MINOR1
    Code associated with hydrographic features (Source: USGS DLG data user guide)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Line feature codes
    Codeset Source:This file, HYDRODLG.LINE

    TYPE
    definition of feature code (Source: USGS DLG data user guide)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Line feature descriptions
    Codeset Source:This file, HYDRODLG.LINE

    SYMBOL
    Arc/Info color symbol for display (Source: n/a)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Arc/Info COLOR lineset
    Codeset Source:Arc/Info software

    FREQUENCY
    number of features of a given value (Source: n/a)

    Range of values
    Minimum:2
    Maximum:15127

    HYDRODLG.POLY
    contains definitions for polygon hydrographic feature codes (Source: n/a)

    MINOR1
    Code associated with hydrographic features (Source: USGS DLG data user guide)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Polygon feature codes
    Codeset Source:This file, HYDRODLG.POLY

    TYPE
    definition of feature code (Source: USGS DLG data user guide)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Polygon feature descriptions
    Codeset Source:This file, HYDRODLG.POLY

    SYMBOL
    Arc/Info color symbol for display (Source: n/a)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Arc/Info COLOR lineset
    Codeset Source:Arc/Info software

    FREQUENCY
    number of features of a given value (Source: n/a)

    Range of values
    Minimum:1
    Maximum:8172

    HYDRODLG.ORDER
    contains Strahler order frequencies/symbol colors (Source: n/a)

    ORDER
    Code used to define stream order (Source: n/a)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Stream order codes
    Codeset Source:this file, HYDRODLG.ORDER

    SYMBOL
    Arc/Info color symbol for display (Source: n/a)

    Formal codeset
    Codeset Name:Arc/Info COLOR lineset
    Codeset Source:Arc/Info software

    FREQUENCY
    number of features of a given value (Source: n/a)

    Range of values
    Minimum:1684
    Maximum:41557

    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    This dataset is in the format of one ARC/INFO coverage with both line and polygon topology, for stream features lakes/reservoirs. The dataset is also provided as two shapefiles, one for streams and a separate one for polygon featuers. There are 9 attributes associated with each line (stream) feature, and 8 for each polygon. The first 8 attributes, MAJOR and MINOR codes 1-4, are part of the standard hierarchical coding scheme of the DLGs. The MAJOR attributes 1 and 2 are coded as 50 or 0, 50 representing a hydrographic feature digitized by the USGS, and 0 representing a hydrographic feature digitized by Wyoming Gap Analysis project. The MINOR attributes 1,2,3 have a numeric code for each feature, for example 412 is the code for stream and 200 is the code for shoreline. Most features only have associated codes at the highest level, MINOR1. (MINOR 2 and 3 identify other codes; for instance a stream may also be labeled as intermittent in MINOR2 and labeled as a boundary for a wetland in MINOR3). The most common MINOR2 attribute is 610, identifying intermittent features. The last two attributes, ORDER and RIPARIAN, were added by Wyoming Gap. ORDER identifies the Strahler order for the stream, 1-7. Polygon labels do not have an ORDER attribute. Arcs identified as shorelines, wetland boundaries or terminal reservoir boundaries are labeled as ORDER = 0. A look-up table for displaying order in ArcPlot is included with the dataset, HYDRO.ORDER. The RIPARIAN attribute was added to identify intermittent streams which might possibly have riparian vegetation associated with them; this attribute was added only for the purposes of riparian modeling in Gap Analysis and has no other functional use within the dataset. Definitions of Minor1,2 and 3 codes are listed here and are also included in two INFO tables accompanying the Arc/Info coverage: HYDRO.LINE and HYDRO.POLY. These files can also serve as display look-up tables for Arcplot, since they include symbol colors for the COLOR lineset. For ArcView users, these INFO files are also available as dBASE files, hy_line.dbf, hy_poly.dbf and hy_order.dbf. Definitions for line attribute values (.AAT):
    200=Shoreline
    412=stream
    605=right bank
    606=left bank
    420=wash
    103=glacier boundary
    201=man-made shore
    406=dam or weir
    202=closure line
    203=indefinite shore (identifies high-water mark)
    204=apparent limit
    400=rapids
    401=falls
    610=intermittent (all else assumed perennial)
    
    Definitions for polygon attribute values (.PAT):
    101=reservoir
    103=glacier
    105=inundation area
    108=submerged area (due to dam-building)
    109=sewage pond
    110=tailings pond
    111=marsh/wetland,
    402=gravel pit
    412=wide river (represented by left and right bank)
    420=emphemeral wash
    421=lake or pond.
    
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: n/a


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    United States Geologic Survey National Mapping Program, data source. Edgematching, corrections, ordering: Margo Berendsen, Tom Kohley - Wyoming Gap Analysis project.

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Data Manager
    Spatial Data and Visualization Center
    Box 4008 University Station
    Laramie, Wyoming 82071
    USA

    307-766-2751 (voice)
    n/a

    Hours_of_Service: 8:00 - 5:00 MST


Why was the data set created?

The purpose of this data layer was to provide a base layer of water features at a statewide level for riparian/aquatic species distribution modeling for the Wyoming Gap Analysis project. However the data may also be used for a variety of other natural resources management/biological studies at the appropriate scale.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    DLG (source 1 of 1)
    U.S. Geological Survey, National Mapping Program, 1994, Digital Line Graphs for Hydrography.

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital map
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 100000
    Source_Contribution: base data source

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Jan-1995 (process 1 of 5)
    Raw DLG data (optional format) for Wyoming was converted to Arc/Info format 1:62,000-scale quads with a 2 meter coordinate resolution (fuzzy tolerance). These quadrangles were then tiled together into 1:100,000-scale quadrangles. During the process of tiling the 1:100,000-scale quadrangles into a statewide coverage, checking was done for proper feature alignment along the edges of the quads (edgematching). Streams or other hydrographic features with a positional offset (edge mismatch) of less than or equal to 200 m were snapped together by splitting the difference between them. In certain areas, it was necessary to refer to USGS 1:24,000-scale topographic maps to correctly determine the method of joining arcs. Editing changes included snapping endpoints of arcs together, adding or moving arc vertices, and adding new arcs to join or lengthen existing features. All arc features representing canals, ditches, or other man-made features were removed. Label errors which were identified by visual comparisons with paper maps were corrected.

    Date: Feb-1995 (process 2 of 5)
    Following edgematching and other corrections to the original DLG data, all natural linear features were ordered, by major drainage (the state wide data was divided into 7 different drainages: North Platte, Belle Fourche, Crow, Wind River/Bighorn, Snake, Bear, Yellowstone) using the Strahler ordering method. The direction of flow of natural hydrographic features was adjusted using the Arc/Info TRACE command to best approximate the direction of flow in the drainage and its basins. A Strahler-ordering fortran program developed by USGS hydrologist, K. Lanfear, was applied to assign stream orders based on directional flow within the drainage. In cases of wide rivers represented by shorelines (instead of a stream centerline), braided rivers or stream networks interconnected circularly, the ordering had to rectified by interactive checking and editing. Wetlands, lakes, ponds and terminal reservoirs are not ordered. Streams flowing into Wyoming from other states (North Platte and Bear River drainages) were ordered based on visual inspection of source streams on 1:100,000-scale USGS maps of adjacent states (Colorado and Utah). Following the ordering and checking process, the individual drainages were appended back into a statewide coverage.

    Date: 1905 (process 3 of 5)
    This shapefile was clipped to the Snake/Salt Basin Boundary, restricted to only Major Streams, and reprojected as part of the Wyoming Water Plan.

    Metadata imported.

    Date: 1905 (process 4 of 5)
    Metadata imported.

    (process 5 of 5)
    Dataset copied.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • D:\GIS\SnakeGIS\20040510version\Baselayers\Major-Streams_ssdd27

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    This product is directly derived from the USGS DLGs, which according to the National Mapping Program do not currently carry quantified accuracy statements. However, procedures used by the NMP to validate the attribute accuracy involve computerized checking of attribute codes against a table of valid codes to endure that each attribute in a file is valid for the category. A manual process involving proof plots is used to verify correct application of codes. The additional attribute added by Wyoming Gap Analysis, stream order, automatic generation by a ordering program. The coding was checked by displaying each order as a different color on screen, and special attention was paid to braided streams or other complicated areas of stream connection. The Strahler order attributes are correct only so far as the connectivity and completeness of the hydrographic network is represented due to generalizations at the 1:100,000-scale. Obviously, there will be differentiation in order at the larger 1:24,000-scale because of the more accurate representations of streams at that scale. Attributes were also checked by visual color displays for intermittent and perennial attributes, as well as natural vs. man-made (all ditches, canals and aqueducts were removed). One section of Wyoming should be noted in particular for incorrect attributing which was corrected by Wyoming Gap Analysis: streams in Weston county, particularly the Lance Creek 1:100,000 quadrangle, were incorrectly labeled as perennial when, according to USGS 1:24,000-scale topographic maps, they were actually intermittent streams. Some linear features were corrected where they were man-made ditches/canals but incorrectly labeled as natural streams (primarily in the Pinedale quadrangle). Approximately 12% of the 1,792 1:24,000-scale topographic maps for Wyoming were used to verify the 1:100,000-scale DLGS, however these quads were not statistically selected for verification but rather were selected to check areas that had already been identified as "problem areas".

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    The USGS NMP identifies these procedures used to qualify the positional accuracy of their DLG products: the data are either manually digitized using equipment with a resolution of 0.001 inch and an absolute accuracy of from 0.003 to 0.005 inch, or are scanned on an automatic device with a resolution of 30 points per millimeter, or 0.0013 inch. The positional accuracy of the data and complete- ness of the file are checked by visually comparing proof plots with the original stable-base source material. These proof plots are generated using automated drafting machines with a resolution of 0.001 inch and an absolute accuracy of from 0.003 to 0.005 inch. Wyoming Gap Analysis converted raw DLG data into Arc/Info format with a 2 meter fuzzy tolerance (minimum distance between coordinates). Wyoming Gap Analysis also performed manual edge-matching along boundaries of 1:100,000-scale quadrangles of the source DLG data in Arc/Info, any positional offsets less than or equal to 200 meters being snapped together by splitting the distance between the two arcs. Other editing performed by Wyoming Gap Analysis which may or may not have an effect on the positional accuracy included adding or moving arc vertices and adding or lengthening arcs to join existing features in the edge-matching process. Grain tolerance used in adding/editing arc vertices was < 50m. Approximately 12% of the 1,792 1:24,000-scale topographic maps for Wyoming were used to verify the 1:100,000-scale DLGS, however these quads were not statistically selected for verification but rather were selected to check areas that had already been identified as "problem areas", areas where its was not possible to determine how to connect streams along quadrangle edges by referring to the 1:100,000-scale maps alone.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    Some attributes may have a zero value because of the hierarchical nature of the DLG MAJOR and MINOR attributes (see the USGS National Mapping Program Digital Line Graphs Data Users Guide 2 for more details). The attribute added by Wyoming Gap Analysis, stream order, is complete for all linework (Arc/Info arc attribute table), line features being labeled as zero corresponding to water features which are not ordered, eg. lakes, ponds and reservoirs. It should be noted that Wyoming Gap Analysis identified the two Yellowstone National Park quadrangles in the northwestern corner of the state to be mapped in less detail than surrounding quadrangles, (not just in the DLG product, but also on the original USGS 1:100,000-scale paper topological maps). Apparently different decision rules were applied by the NMP in translating hydrography from the 1:24,000-scale down to the 1:100,000-scale for this region of the state, and the data for these two quads should be considered as incomplete in comparison to the level of detail mapped for adjacent areas.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    There are no unclosed polygons, intersections without nodes, or polygons without labels or with more than one label. Arc/Info's topological checking program CLEAN was used to correct intersections without nodes, identify unclosed polygons and remove duplicate lines with the same beginning and ending nodes. Checks were not made for possible errors such as sliver polygons or duplicate lines missed by CLEAN, though if any such errors exist they are likely to be minor due to the topological tests performed on the raw DLG data by the USGS NMP.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints:
Wyoming only. This data should never be used a scale larger than 1:100,000. The data is only as accurate as the source maps it was produced from, and use is dependent on the date of the sources and quality at which they were produced.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Data Manager
    Spatial Data and Visualization Center
    Box 4008 University Station
    Laramie, Wyoming 82071
    USA

    307-766-2751 (voice)
    n/a

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    Downloadable Data

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The distributor shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of this data, based on the description of appropriate/inappropriate used described in this metadata document. It is strongly recommended that this data is directly acquired from the distributor described above and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. This data was developed and is meant to be used at the 1:100,000-scale (or smaller scale) for the purpose of identifying hydrographic feature locations in Wyoming. makes no claims for the data's suitability for other purposes.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 17-May-2004

Metadata author:
Margo Berendsen
Box 4008 University Station
Laramie, Wyoming 82071
USA

307-766-2751 (voice)
meh@uwyo.edu

Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.7.33 on Mon May 17 16:48:51 2004