|
Home Page
News & Information
River Basin Plans
Basin Advisory Groups
Planning Products
|
Green River Basin Water Plan
Technical Memoranda
| SUBJECT: |
Green River Basin Plan Surface Water
Quality |
|
| PREPARED BY: |
Jake Strohman, States West Water Resources Corporation |
Introduction
The purpose of this water quality section is to identify on-going watershed management planning
efforts; define opportunities for potential cooperation and coordination among these efforts; identify
basin-wide opportunities to enhance or protect water quality; and, to identify water quality issues
within the Green River Water Plan area. Groundwater quality is provided separately in the section on
groundwater availability.
The quality of water refers to its physical, chemical, radiological, biological and bacteriological
properties. The concentration levels of various constituents within the water properties dictate the uses
and potential uses of a water body. Quality of a water body can be impacted from the natural processes
on the environment or from manmade actions. The success of a water development project is
dependent on the ability of the source to meet the water quality needs of the proposed use(s). In
addition, the project itself must protect existing and potential uses of waters of the state and interstate
salinity standards.
The State of Wyoming passed enabling legislation known as the Environmental Quality Act in 1973.
The purpose of the law was directed at the concern that pollution "will imperil public health and
welfare, create public and private nuisances, be harmful to wildlife, fish and aquatic life, and impair
domestic, agricultural, industrial, recreational and other beneficial uses" (Environmental Quality Act
1973). The declared policy of the law was to enable the state "to prevent, reduce and eliminate
pollution; to preserve, and enhance the water and reclaim the land of Wyoming; to plan development,
use, reclamation, preservation and enhancement of the air, land, and water resources of the state; to
preserve and exercise the primary responsibilities and rights of the state of Wyoming; to secure
cooperation between agencies of the state, agencies of other states, interstate agencies, and the federal
government in carrying out these objectives"(Environmental Quality Act 1973). Recognizing the
importance of public involvement, the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act contains policy and rule
development procedures that provide more public involvement than other state agencies.
The Water Quality Division (WQD) of the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is the
designated state agency for water quality management in the State of Wyoming. Given the above
directives, the WQD has developed a large number of water quality protection programs. These
programs deal with point (PS) and non-point sources (NPS) of pollution and their potential impacts to
surface water (SW) and groundwater (GW). Table 1 provides a summary of state programs directed at
water quality. Table 1 also contains some federal programs where a similar state program does not
exist or where Wyoming does not have primacy of a federal program.
The federal government has been provided many authorities to protect and clean up water quality and
the environment. Examples of these authorities are the Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, Pollution Prevention Act, National Environmental
Protection Act, Solid Waste Disposal Act, Toxic Substance Control Act, Clean Air Act, and others.
Most of the federal programs dealing with water quality allow the states to obtain primacy to
administer the federal programs. However, even if a state has primacy for a federal program, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the ability to take action if a state is not administering a
program to their satisfaction and, in some cases, EPA is required by federal law to step in if a state fails
to take appropriate action.
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Surface Water: Pursuant to the Environmental Quality Act, the WQD developed and implemented
surface water quality standards contained in Chapter 1, Wyoming Water Quality Rules and
Regulations in 1974. Chapter 1 contains numerical and narrative standards to establish effluent
limitations for those discharges requiring control via permits to discharge in the case of point sources
and best management practices in the case of nonpoint sources. The water quality standards apply to
all periods of flow except low flow conditions as described in Section 11 of Chapter 1.
Surface water classification is currently separated into four different classes:
- Class 1 are those surface waters in which no further water quality degradation by point source
discharges other than dams will be allowed.
- Class 2 are those surface waters, other than Class 1, which are determined to be presently supporting
game fish or have the hydrologic and natural water quality potential to support game fish.
- Class 3 are those surface waters, other than Class 1, which are determined to be presently supporting
nongame fish only or have the hydrologic and natural water quality potential to support nongame fish
only.
- Class 4 are those surface waters, other than Class 1, which are determined to not have the hydrologic
or natural water quality potential to support fish and include all intermittent and ephemeral streams.
Appendix A of Chapter 1 contains a listing of the classification of all surface waters that are named on
the USGS 1:500,000 Hydrologic Map of Wyoming. Also included in Appendix A is a map showing
stream classifications and USGS stream gaging stations. The current stream classifications of the
Green River Basin, Great Divide Basin and the Little Snake River Basin are shown in Figure 1 of this
technical memo.

click to enlarge
WQD is required by Section 6 of Chapter 1 to review and conference with the State Engineer
concerning proposed new diversions that could cause violations of surface water standards.
Interstate Water Quality Standards: The Green River Basin and Little Snake River Basin are part of
the Colorado River Basin. The Colorado River Basin Salinity Forum is an organization composed of
water quality and water resource representatives of the states of Arizona, California, Colorado,
Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming with the responsibility for developing salinity standards and
criteria for the waters of the Colorado River Basin. The basin-wide water quality standards for salinity
consists of numeric water quality criteria at three lower Colorado River stations and a Plan of
Implementation that describes the overall program. The Plan of Implementation also describes specific
salinity control projects that are being and will be implemented to remove sufficient salt from the river
system so the salinity concentrations of the River's waters arriving at the lower three stations do not
exceed the numeric criteria values. Under the federal Clean Water Act, the water quality standards for
salinity are reviewed every three years and the Plan of Implementation is jointly revised and adjusted
by the states and involved federal agencies. A separate memorandum "Colorado River Basin Salinity
Control Program" addresses salinity in more detail.
Ground water: In 1980, the WQD developed and implemented groundwater quality standards,
contained in Chapter 8 of the Wyoming Water Quality Rules and Regulations, to protect existing and
future groundwater uses. These regulations contain narrative and numerical standards used to classify
ground waters of the State and provide criteria to determine acceptable concentration of discharges to
ground water. These standards are also used to determine the degree of groundwater cleanup
necessary to restore polluted ground water to pre-contamination use.
The WQD uses a two-tiered classification system. The first tier requires protection of existing uses
regardless of water quality considerations. The second tier requires protection of all potential uses
based on ambient groundwater quality. The highest standard of groundwater quality maintenance,
given existing or potential uses, determines the governing tier. Maps showing groundwater
classification are not available because the availability of well data and the diverse geology of the State
prohibit accurate regional delineation of groundwater classification. Unlike surface water standards,
groundwater classification is invoked only when a discharge to ground water has occurred or is
proposed.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has groundwater standards to regulate facilities under their
jurisdiction including uranium mine and mill operations. As mentioned in the introduction, ground
water quality in the Green River Basin is characterized in a separate memorandum.
BASIN SURFACE WATER QUALITY
The Department of Environmental Quality has completed a stream classification for all surface water
bodies in the project study area. The classification indicates whether a stream is currently supporting
or has the potential to support the uses of that classification. The entire Great Divide Basin is listed as
Class 4. Stream segments or water bodies that currently do not meet the classification are provided in
the 303(d) list.
The streams in or near the mountains contain water quality rated as good. The water quality of these
mountain streams deteriorates as it flows across the plains. The degradation of water quality is caused
by both natural and manmade sources. The water quality of many streams originating in the plains is
rated as fair to poor. The water quality of surface water bodies is obtained from U.S. Geological
Survey reports of sampling accomplished from surface water stations. The systematic water quality
sampling stations are shown in Figure 1.
The dissolved solids concentration of surface water stations in the project area are shown in Figure 2.
All of the Green River Drainage above Fontenelle Reservoir and the Green River itself above Flaming
Gorge Reservoir contain median dissolved solids concentrations of less than 500 mg/L. Flaming Gorge
Reservoir has a median at or slightly above 500 mg/L. The Little Sandy River has a median less than
500 mg/L at the Sublette County line while monitoring stations downstream on the Big Sandy River
show concentrations increasing up to about 3,000 mg/L before the confluence with the Green River.
The Blacks Fork River Drainage and the Henry's Fork have a median dissolved solids concentrations
of streams in the range from 500 to 1200 mg/L except for the Blacks Fork River near the Utah State
line and the Hams Fork near Kemmerer which has medians below 500 mg/L. The Bitter Creek
drainage has median dissolved solids concentrations ranging from approximately 750 to 2900 mg/L
with the exception of Killpecker Creek which has a median above 4,000mg/L. The Vermillion Creek
Drainage has a median of approximately 1,000 mg/L.

click to enlarge

click to enlarge
All water bodies in the drainage system are within the acceptable water quality pH range of 6.5 to 9.0.
However, pH readings for the Green River Basin indicate the water as being slightly alkaline. The
temperature of water in the Green River Basin varies from 0 degrees Celsius in the winter to 25
degrees Celsius in the summer.
The concentrations of total phosphorous in some streams frequently exceed the limits recommended to
protect reservoirs and streams from nuisance growth of algae and other aquatic plants. Many of the
reservoirs and lakes experience phytoplankton blooms in late summer and early fall due to nutrient and
eutrophic water quality.
Most of the sediment in the Green River Basin is deposited in Fontenelle and Flaming Gorge
Reservoirs with very little impact on the down river states. The Department of Environmental Quality
has expressed concern on sediment loading in the Blacks Fork River Drainage and the Little Snake
River Drainage.
Few bacteria concentrations in water bodies within the study area exceed the Department of
Environmental Quality surface water standards. The segments that do not meet these standards are
listed in the 303(d) report. Most of these water bodies that do not meet the bacteria requirements are
being investigated to determine if the cause is domestic wastewater treatment discharges.
The Department of Environmental Quality has recently increased surface water monitoring to address
1999 amendments to the Environmental Quality Act under W.S. 35-11-103 ( c ) & 302 (b) directed at
"credible data." Part of this monitoring program will be directed at monitoring invertebrate
communities in the Green River Basin. The invertebrates population surveys by USGS show water
quality in the plains is not as good as water quality in mountain streams although overall basin
invertebrates indicate good water quality. Invertebrates are normally important because they are a
source of food for fish.
To view specific water quality data from USGS river stations in the project area, visit
http://wy.water.usgs.gov/
TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS/303 (D) LIST
All water bodies within the delineated planning area meet the existing classification uses with the
exception of those water bodies contained in the 1998 303(d) list in Appendix 1. Section 303(d) of the
Clean Water Act (CWA) requires the State of Wyoming to identify water bodies that do not meet
designated uses and are not expected to meet water quality standards after application of technology-
based controls; identify a priority ranking for each water quality limited segment; and develop total
maximum daily loads (TMDL) to restore each water body segment to pre-designated uses. EPA
requires each state to submit their lists of impaired or threatened water bodies every two years and is
required to accomplish the work if a state fails to perform the required activities.
A simple explanation of TMDL is the ability of a water body to assimilate pollution and continue to
meet the designated uses. A TMDL must be established for each pollutant which is a source of stream
impairment. The TMDL process provides a way to document how water quality standards are being
implemented; provides the framework for thorough watershed planning for multiple sources or causes
of impairment; provides states an opportunity to identify priorities based on risk and target TMDLs for
completion; and promotes cost-effective solutions to pollution. The minimum requirements of a
TMDL are:
- application of TMDLs result in maintaining and attaining water quality standards;
- TMDLs must contain a margin of safety and consider seasonality;
- TMDLs include a quantified pollutant reduction target;
- TMDLs must consider all significant sources;
- TMDLs are supported by an appropriate level of technical analysis;
- TMDLs must have a quantified target or endpoint (i.e. water quality standard);
- TMDLs apportion responsibility for taking actions; and
- TMDLs involve some level of public involvement
TMDL implementation tools vary and include: NPDES permits; other federal laws and requirements;
state and local laws and ordinances; and individual voluntary-based actions. The biggest challenge of
the TMDL process occurs when a watershed segment has been impacted and the pollution is
determined to be a combination of point and nonpoint sources. The solution has to be a balanced
approach directed at correcting the problems of each river, stream, lake or estuary. This balanced
approach may be difficult to accomplish due to the administration of point sources of pollution by
permits and the administration of nonpoint sources by best management practices.
Haggarty Creek TMDL
Haggarty Creek, in the Little Snake Drainage and in the Sierra Madre mountains does not support
aquatic life at levels comparable to unimpaired waters in the area due to elevated concentrations of
copper for approximately 4 miles downstream of the inactive Ferris Haggarty Mine. In 1996, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency deferred the listing of the mine as a superfund site allowing the
State of Wyoming, through the Abandoned Mine Lands (AML) Division of the DEQ, to investigate the
site and recommend solutions to reduce copper concentrations that will allow water quality sufficient
to support trout populations. The mine is located at approximately 9,500 feet above sea level with no
commercial electrical power service to the region. Hence, passive (using flow through passive
treatment media) rather than active (using electro-mechanical equipment) treatment is preferred.
A consultant, contracted by the AML, has completed an investigation of the site and has conducted
pilot scale passive treatment studies for copper removal. The consultant has concluded that the water
can viably be treated by passive treatment. Full-scale treatment is scheduled for installation in 2000.
However, right-of-way acquisition may delay the timing of installation.
The WQD developed a draft TMDL for the section of Haggarty Creek impaired by the mine discharge
in March of 1999. This draft has not been finalized due to the need to complete ambient water quality
sampling upstream of the Ferris Haggarty Mine, investigate the ambient levels of copper in streams
undisturbed by mining activities, and the determination of the actual efficiency of copper removal after
installation of the passive treatment system. The field studies to be conducted by WQD will
encompass all tributaries of Haggarty Creek.
AQUIFER SENSITIVITY/VULNERABILITY
A system to assess the sensitivity and vulnerability of groundwater to surface water or other surface
activities that have the potential to pollute has been developed. The Wyoming Department of
Environmental Quality, in conjunction with the Wyoming Department of Agriculture and the U.S.
EPA contracted with the University of Wyoming to develop statewide vulnerability maps to assess the
tendency or likelihood for contaminants to reach a specified position in the groundwater system after
introduction at the same location above the uppermost aquifer. Aquifer vulnerability maps were
developed to combine factors associated with the hydrogeological setting with indicators of the nature
and extent of potential contaminant sources to determine the potential impact of these anthropogenic
influences on the groundwater quality. In lay person terms, it is the potential of a contaminant applied
at the surface to impact the water quality of the shallow uppermost aquifer at that application location.
See Figure 3 for aquifer sensitivity of the project area and Figure 4 for vulnerability to pesticides for
the project area.

click to enlarge

click to enlarge
References
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum, October 1999, Supplemental Report on the 1999
Review "Water Quality Standards for Salinity Colorado River System."
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, Current Edition, Wyoming Water
Quality Rules and Regulations, Chapters 1 through 22.
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, December 1999, "Draft Wyoming
Nonpoint Source Management Plan Update."
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, January 2000, "Draft Source Water
Protection Program."
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, July 1997, "Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL) Work Plan."
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, June 2000, Wyoming's 305(b) Report,
"Water Quality Assessment."
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, June 1998, Watershed Program "Five
Year Comprehensive Monitoring Plan."
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, June 1998, "Wyoming Wellhead
Protection Program."
Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division, March 1998, "Wyoming's 1998 303(d)
Waterbody List."
DiRienzo, Bill, April-May 2000, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality
Division, Personal Interview.
Goyn, Lanny, June 2000, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division,
Personal Interview.
Miller, Cheryl, May 2000, United States Department of Interior, Geologic Survey, Personal
Interview.
Ogle, Kathy, April 2000, United States Department of Interior, Geologic Survey, Personal Interview.
Richmond, Tim , June 2000, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Abandoned Mines
Division, Personal Interview.
Smith, Jack, April 2000, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division,
Personal Interview.
United States Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey, 1988, Water Resources Investigations
Report 87-4022, "Streamflow Characteristics of the Green, Bear, and Snake River Basins,
Wyoming through 1984."
United States Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey, 1988, Water Resources Investigations
Report 99-4097, "Streamflow and Dissolved-Solids Trends, Through 1996, In the Colorado
River Basin Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming."
United States Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey, October 1985, Open File Report 83-761
"Hydrology of Area 52 , Rocky Mountain Coal Province, Wyoming, Colorado, Idaho, and
Utah."
United States Department of Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey, Water Year 1997-1999, Water Quality
Data, Green River Basin, http://wy.water.usgs.gov/
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999, "Clean Water Action Plan Fact Sheet,"
http://cleanwater.gov/news/fact_sheet.html [new link 10/2009 HERE]
University of Wyoming, Water Resources Center and Wyoming State Geological Survey, 1998, SDVC
Report 98-01, Volume I & II, "Ground Water Vulnerability Assessment Handbook."
Water Quality Programs
| Program |
Implementing Agency |
Authority |
Type |
Program Description |
| NPDES |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 Chapter 2, 4, 7, 10, 18 |
SW PS |
Any discharge to surface waters of the state requires
a permit to discharge. Each permitted discharge must meet effluent limitations
within the TMDL allocations and maintain the use of the receiving water body. There
are currently 70 NPDES permits in the study area that are classified as not being a
storm water permit. There are several hundred storm water permits in the study area.
Information on this program is available at
http://deq.state.wy.us/wqd.htm [new link 10/2009 HERE]
|
| Permit to Construct |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 Chapters 3, 5, 11, 12, 15, 20, 21 |
SW GW PS |
Any public water supply system or any facility
capable of causing or contributing to pollution is required to obtain a permit to
construct prior to commencing construction. This program is directed at ensuring
facilities are designed, constructed and operated to protect ground water and
surface water resources. Chapter 5 requires certified operators for public water
and sewage facilities. |
| Nonpoint Source Management and Control |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3, Section 319 of CWA |
SW GW NPS |
The state nonpoint source control program is
a voluntary and incentive based program. The program seeks to control through
education and encouragement of Best Management Practices, including demonstration,
information and education, and restoration projects. Assessments and demonstration
projects are selected for funding by the Wyoming Nonpoint Source Task force. The
NPS Program manages Wyoming's allocations provided as grants by Section 319 and
205(j) of the Clean Water Act.
Wetlands program uses a certification process to approve or deny federal permit
actions concerning wetlands. Wetlands banking was established to expedite permitting.
It allows industry, landowners, or others to build credits for the construction,
restoration or enhancement of wetlands. These credits can be bought and sold as a
means to expedite the mitigation of wetland impacts.
The Nonpoint Source Management Plan is available at
http://deq.state.wy.us/wqd.htm [new link 10/2009 HERE] |
| Water Quality Assessments & Impaired Surface Water Bodies |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3, S. 305(b) & 303(d) of CWA |
SW GW NPS PS |
Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act requires each
state to assess and report on the quality of waters on a 2 year frequency.
Section 303(d) requires each state every two years to list water bodies which are
water quality impaired or threatened. This report and list are available at
http://deq.state.wy.us/wqd/wtrshedpg.htm [new link 10/2009 HERE] |
| Surface Water Monitoring |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 |
SW PS NPS |
The WQD is progressing toward a more comprehensive
monitoring and assessment program. In 1996, the Legislature passed a credible data
law requiring the WQD to ensure all data used in listing impaired or threatened waters
requiring scientifically valid data to be used. This credible data law has significantly
increased monitoring of surface water in Wyoming. Monitoring efforts by WQD to comply
with the credible data law are contained in the 305(b) report. |
| 404 Permit |
US Army Corps of Engineers |
Clean Water Act |
SW PS NPS |
A permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers
to discharge dredge or fill material into navigable waters. |
| 401 Certifications |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 |
SW PS NPS |
Any application for a Army Corp of Engineers 404
dredge and fill permit requires a certification from WQD that the dredge or fill
will comply with all the requirements of Sections 301,302,303, 306 & 307 of the
Clean Water Act. |
| Spill Program |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 Chapter 4 |
SW GW PS |
Any person owning or having control over oil
or a hazardous substance, which after release, enters or threatens to enter
waters of the state shall take action to stop and contain the release, notify
WQD, correct the cause, clean up the release and dispose of the waste in an
acceptable manner. |
| Source Water Protection |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 |
SW GW |
Wyoming has developed a voluntary source water protection
program as required by each state under Section 1453 of the SDWA. Source water
assessment involves four steps: delineate the area which contributes water to the
well or surface water intake; inventory of potential sources of contamination;
complete an analysis of the susceptibility of the well or intake to contamination
from the previous inventory; and draft up a report summarizing the findings. |
| Wellhead Protection Program |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 |
GW |
Wyoming has developed and received approval
from EPA endorsing its wellhead protection program developed pursuant to Section
1428 of the SDWA. The program is voluntary and allows public water supply systems
to protect groundwater sources of supply. |
| Wellhead Protection Program |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 |
GW |
Wyoming has developed and received approval from
EPA endorsing its wellhead protection program developed pursuant to Section
1428 of the SDWA. The program is voluntary and allows public water supply
systems to protect groundwater sources. |
| Abandoned Mines |
DEQ/AML |
Article 12 |
PS NPS SW GW |
The abandoned mines program accomplishes reclamation
of eligible properties adversely affected by mining prior to August 3, 1977.
Eligible Public facilities and utilities adversely affected by mining prior to
August 3, 1977 and the construction of new public facilities or utilities in
communities impacted by coal or mineral mining and processing practices. |
| Landfills & Hazardous Wastes
| DEQ/SHWD |
EQA Article 5 |
PS SW GW |
No person, except when authorized by a SHWD permit,
shall locate, construct, operate or close a solid waste management facility or
modify the design, construction or operation of a solid waste management facility.
The SHWD has primacy of the federal RCRA program regulating hazardous waste
generators and transporters, hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal
facility operators, and hazardous waste corrective actions. |
| Superfund Sites
| US EPA |
CERCLA |
|
EPA regulates superfund sites in Wyoming. |
| Well Construction & Abandonment |
WY State Engineer (SEO) |
SEO Regulations |
PS GW |
The state engineer has regulations requiring adequate
design, construction and abandonment of wells to protect groundwater resources. |
| Colorado River Salinity Standards |
AZ, CA, CO, NV, NM, UT, WY |
P.L. 93-320 Forum Policies WY/WQD Ch. 6 |
SW GW PS NPS |
The 7 states in the Colorado River Basin form an
interstate forum with a goal directed at maintenance of water quality so that
numeric criteria are not exceeded in the lower basin. The forum has developed
policies for surface water discharges from municipal and industrial sources as
well as natural occurring groundwater and fish hatcheries. The Big Sandy
Salinity Project in Wyoming was directed at NPS returns to SW and GW from
agricultural irrigation operations. |
| Wellhead Protection Program |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 3 |
GW |
Wyoming has developed and received approval from
EPA endorsing its wellhead protection program developed pursuant to Section 1428
of the SDWA. The program is voluntary and allows public water supply systems to
protect groundwater sources of supply. |
| Underground Storage Tanks |
DEQ/WQD |
EQA Article 14 |
PS SW GW |
Wyoming has primacy of the federal RCRA program
regulating underground storage tanks (UST). This program regulates the design,
construction and operation of USTs and provides financial responsibility for UST
and commercial above ground storage tank owner/operators. In addition, a cleanup
fund exists to remediate contamination caused by leaking USTs. |
| Underground Injection Control Wells |
DEQ/WQD
DEQ/LQD
OGCC |
EQA Article 3 Chapters 13 & 16
Article 4
W.S. 30-5-101 thru 305 |
PS GW |
Any person who construct, installs, or operates a Class
I, IV, or V underground injection control well must first obtain a permit from the
DEQ/WQD. Class I wells are deep injection wells that discharge into a Class VI
groundwater formation and include hazardous waste wells of which there are none in Wyoming.
Commercial Class II wells are regulated as a Class I well. Class IV wells inject hazardous
waste into shallow aquifers and are prohibited. Class V wells are wells, other than the
other 4 classifications, injecting into or above underground sources of drinking water
such as drain fields, air conditioning return wells, dry wells, etc.
Any person injecting into a class III well must obtain a permit or license from DEQ/WQD.
A class III well injects into or above a drinking water for the purpose of extracting
minerals. The most common in situ mining wells in Wyoming are uranium and soda ash.
Any person injecting into a noncommercial class II well is required to obtain a permit
from the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Class II wells inject fluids which
are brought to the surface in connection with natural gas storage operations or conventional
oil and gas production, fluids for enhanced recovery of oil or natural gas and for storage
of hydrocarbons. |
| State Pesticide Management Plan (SMP) |
WY Dept. of Agriculture |
W.S. 35-7-350 thru 374 |
NPS SW GW |
The Department of Agriculture has developed a SMP
directed at the protection of water resources from the application of pesticides.
The SMP program has received EPA approval. |
| SMP GW Monitoring |
WY Dept. of Agriculture |
W.S. 35-7-350 thru 374 |
GW |
Utilizing pesticide registration fees and funding
from 319 grants, the USGS has been contracted to conduct a state-wide assessment
of the contamination of groundwater caused by pesticides. Of the counties completed
at the time of this report, no levels above drinking water maximum contaminant levels
have been found. Monitoring results can be accessed at
http://wy.water.usgs.gov/projects/pests/index.htm [new link 10/2009 HERE] |
| Mines |
DEQ/LQD |
EQA Article 4 |
PS NPS SW GW |
License or permits are required for any mining operation
or operation by which solid minerals are intended to be extracted from the earth.
This includes surface and underground mining. The extraction of sand, gravel, dirt,
scoria, limestone, dolomite, shale, ballast, or feldspar by a landowner for
noncommercial use does not require a permit nor does an area of less than 10 surface
acres under certain conditions. |
APPENDIX 1 GREEN RIVER BASIN WATER 303(d) LIST
From List A: Water bodies requiring TMDLs, for which there is credible data that indicates that
reach does not support all its designated uses.
Green River Hams Fork Waterbody ID: WYGR14040107-020-3 has a listed credible impairment of
pH with a source noted as nonpoint source contamination and states that cold water fish are threatened or impaired.
From List B: Water bodies requiring TMDLs in the next two years due to routine NPDES renewal
process for permits where Waste Load Allocations are involved.
Green River Smiths Fork Waterbody ID: WYGR14040107-041-2 has a listed data source from the
Mountain View WWTP with contaminants of concern being ammonia, fecal, and total residual chlorine.
Green River Hams Fork Waterbody ID: WYGR14040107-020-3 Kemmerer WWTP with the
same information as Mountain View WWTP.
Little Snake River Waterbody ID: WYLS 14050003-001-4 Dixon WWTP with the same
information as Mountain View WWPT
From List C: Water bodies requiring TMDLs, for which there is data indicating trends away from
supporting beneficial use and where there are improvement plans or other corrective actions in progress.
Green River East Fork Smiths Fork Waterbody ID: WYGR14040107-15-9-1
Green River West Fork Smiths Fork
WYGR14040107-04-2-2
Green River Willow Creek
WYGR14040107-27-9-1
The previously mentioned waterbodies are showing credible impairments of silt.
Green River Reardon Draw Waterbody ID: WYGR14040101-28-0-1 is showing a credible impairment
of physical degradation.
Little Snake Littlefield Creek WYLS 14050004-06-7-1
McKinney Creek
WYLS 14050004-02-2-2
Muddy Creek
WYLS 14050004-06-2-1
Savery Creek
WYLS 14050003-00-4-3
All of the Little Snake River tributaries referenced above have silt listed as a credible impairment.
Little Snake Loco Creek
WYLS 14050003-07-2-2
Loco Creek
WYLS 14050003-07-1-1
Loco Creek West Fork
WYLS 14050003-07-0-1
The three Little Snake River tributaries listed immediately above are showing credible impairments of silt, temperature and nutrients.
Little Snake Muddy Creek WYLS 14050004-00-7-3 shows credible impairments of silt and salinity from total dissolved solids.
From List D: Water bodies removed from the 1996 303(d) list of water bodies requiring TMDLs.
Green River Pixley Creek WYGR 14040101-228-1 was previously impaired by silt and salinity.
Little Snake Ledford Slough WYGR 14050003 was previously impaired by ammonia, chorine and pathogens.
From List E: List of water bodies from the 1996 303(d) list requiring further monitoring to determine beneficial use attainment.
303(d) E LIST
| Basin | Name | Waterbody ID |
Cl | Monitor Reason |
| GR | Birch Creek | WYGR14040101-051-2 | 3 | no primary data |
| GR | Dry Piney Creek | WYGR14040101-278-1 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Fontenelle Creek | WYGR14040101-049-2 | 2 | long term monitoring |
| GR | Fontenelle Creek | WYGR14040101-186-1 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Green River | WYGR14040101-012-4 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Green River | WYGR14040101-012-4 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | Muddy Creek | WYGR14040101-207-1 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Rock Creek | WYGR14040101-194-1 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | New Fork River | WYGR14040102-029-2 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | New Fork River | WYGR14040101-060-2 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Pole Creek | WYGR14040102-238-1 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Alkali Creek | WYGR14040103-128-1 | 4 | no primary data |
| GR | Green River | WYGR14040103-026-3 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | Big Sandy River | WYGR14040104-026-3 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | Little Sandy River | WYGR14040104-149-1 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | Bitter Creek | WYGR14040105-024-3 | 4 | old fecal, selenium |
| GR | Current Creek | WYGR14040106-034-2 | 2 | ongoing study |
| GR | Flaming Gorge Reservoir | WYGR14040106-001-5 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | Green River | WYGR14040106-006-4 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Red Creek | WYGR14040106-036-2 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | GR Blacks Fork | WYGR14040107-002-5 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | GR Blacks Fork | WYGR14040107-004-5 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | GR Hams Fork | WYGR14040107-045-2 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | GR Smiths Fork | WYGR14040107-017-3 | 2 | no recent data |
| GR | Willow Creek | WYGR14040107-171-1 | 2 | no primary data |
| GR | Albert Creek | WYGR14040108-021-3 | 3 | no primary data |
| GR | Vermillion Creek | WYGR14040109-025-3 | 2 | inconclusive data |
| GR | Vermillion Creek N. Fork | WYGR14040109-124-1 | 2 | inconclusive data |
|