Wyoming State Water Plan, Wyoming Water Development Office
Rafting on Snake River Lake Marie, Snowy Mountains Wyoming Wind River Range picture

Green River Basin Water Plan
Technical Memoranda

SUBJECT: Green River Basin Plan
Surface Water Data Collection and Study Period Selection

PREPARED BY: Meg Frantz and Linda Williams, Boyle Engineering


Introduction

Modeling the Green River Basin requires selection of an appropriate period of record for hydrologic analysis. The feasibility study (Boyle, 1998) determined that three 12-month spreadsheet models (one each representing normal-year, dry-year, and wet-year streamflows) constitute an appropriate level of detail for a modeling tool to verify existing uses and evaluate future surface water uses. Gage flows used in the three spreadsheets are to be typical of three different conditions and are to be developed by averaging observed streamflows that occurred during historical normal, wet, or dry years. Accordingly, the objectives of this task were to:

Study Period Selection

Literature Review

Several studies on the Green River basin were reviewed to determine the hydrologic study period used for each:

This brief summary indicates that a potential study period could begin thirty to fifty years ago and extend through 1998 (most current data available). A thirty to fifty year period ending in 1998 should provide sufficient variability to capture a wide range of hydrologic conditions, including wet and dry cycles.

Review of Reservoirs

Because a single annual cycle will be used to model each hydrologic condition, the normal data developed for input to the model is best derived from an operationally consistent time period. Construction or major modification of a reservoir during the study period would influence the downstream gages, hence reservoir history places significant control on selection of the study period. For this reason, major reservoirs (greater than 10,000 acre-feet) that have been constructed or modified during the past fifty years were reviewed to consider their influence on selection of the study period, with the following summarized results:

Initial screening of current basin operations suggests that the study period begin in 1971 and end in 1998. By 1971, every major existing reservoir except for Stateline was in place. A twenty-year study period (1979-1998) consistent with the post-construction period of Stateline Reservoir may be too short for a quantitative analysis. An alternative is to select 1971 through 1998 and adjust the gage below Stateline Reservoir (09220000 - East Fork of Smith Fork below Robertson) from 1971 to 1979 to reflect representative operations of Stateline Reservoir, had it existed during this time period.

Review of Streamflow Records

Analysis of available streamflow data consisted of reviewing the USGS Water-Data Report, Volume 1, Surface Water. This report lists discontinued and active surface water discharge, water quality, sediment and biological stations. This information was supplemented by a review of data reported in the SEO Annual Hydrographer's Report. Based on this review, Table 1 shows the period of record for selected gages within the Upper Green River, Blacks Fork, Henrys Fork, and Little Snake River basins. Some gage data may exist for periods prior to the period of record shown. These periods have not been listed because they are of short duration (less than 5 years continuous data) or are prior to 1930. The period of record is listed as calendar month-year. If records have been obtained from the Hydrographer's Report, only the year may be listed. Typically, flows have been recorded by the SEO for the April-September time period.

Table 1 - USGS Gage Stations in the Green River Basin within Wyoming
Station No. Station Name Drainage Area
(mi2)
Period of Record
From To
Upper Green River
09188500 Green River at Warren Bridge, near Daniel 468.0
Oct-31
Oct-93
Sep-92;
Present
09189000 Beaver Creek near Daniel 141.0
Oct-38 Sep-54
09189495 / SEO North Horse Creek above Sherman Ranger Station 42.8
Oct-82 Sep-84
09189500 Horse Creek at Sherman Ranger Station 43.0
Oct-54 Sep-74
09189550 South Horse Creek near Merna 33.3
Oct-82
Apr-85
Sep-84;
Sep-85
09190000 Horse Creek near Daniel 105.0
Oct-31
Sep-82
Oct-54;
Sep-85
09191300 / SEO South Cottonwood Creek near Big Piney 21.4
Oct-82 Sep-84
09191500 Cottonwood Creek near Daniel 202.0
Oct-38 Sep-54
09192750 New Fork River above New Fork Lakes 21.8
Apr-85 Sep-85
09193000 New Fork River below New Fork Lake, near Cora 36.2
Oct-38
Apr-72
Oct-71;
Oct-72
09196500 Pine Creek above Fremont Lake 75.8
Oct-54 Nov-97
09197000 Pine Creek below Fremont Lake 114.0
Apr-85
Apr-88
Sep-86;
Present
09198000 Pine Creek at Pinedale 118.0
Oct-15 Sep-54
09198500 Pole Creek below Little Half Moon Lake, near Pinedale 87.5
Oct-38 Sep-71
09199500 Fall Creek near Pinedale 37.2
Oct-38 Sep-71
09201000 New Fork River near Boulder 552.0
Oct-14 Sep-69
09202000 Boulder Creek below Boulder Lake, near Boulder 130.0
Oct-38
May-72
Oct-71;
Sep-73
09203000 East Fork River near Big Sandy 79.2
Oct-38 Sep-92
09204000 Silver Creek near Big Sandy 45.4
Oct-38 Sep-71
09205000 New Fork River near Big Piney 1230.0 e Sep-54 Present
09205490 N. Piney Creek above Apperson Creek, near Mason 29.6
Oct-82
1985
1989
Sep-84;
1987;
Present
09205500 North Piney Creek near Mason (Marbleton) 58.0 e Oct-31
May-72
Oct-71;
Sep-72
SEO Middle Piney Creek at Forest boundary

1992 Present
09206000 Middle Piney Creek below South Fork, near Big Piney, WY 34.3
Aug-39
Oct-41
Sep-40;
Sep-54
SEO South Piney Creek near Snider Basin

1992 Present
09207700 Dry Piney Creek near Big Piney 67.0 e Oct-65 Sep-73
0920800 LaBarge Creek near LaBarge Meadows Ranger Station 6.3 e Oct-40
Oct-50
Sep-42;
Sep-81
09208400 LaBarge Creek above Viola 122.0
Oct-82 Sep-84
09208500 LaBarge Creek near Viola 172.0
Oct-40 Sep-49
09209400 Green River near LaBarge 3910.0 e Oct-63 Present
09209500 Green River near Fontenelle 3970.0
Oct-46 Mar-65
09210500 Fontenelle Creek near Herschler Ranch, near Fontenelle 152.0
Oct-51 Present
09211000 Fontenelle Creek near Fontenelle 224.0
Oct-31 Sep-53
09211200 Green River below Fontenelle Reservoir 4280.0
Oct-63 Present
09212500 Big Sandy River (Creek) at Leckie Ranch near Big Sandy 94.0 e Oct-39
Mar-72
Oct-71;
Sep-87
09213500 Big Sandy River near Farson 322.0
Apr-53 Present
09214000 Little Sandy Creek near Elkhorn 20.9
Oct-39 Sep-71
09214500 Little Sandy Creek above Eden 134.0
Oct-54 Sep-81
09215000 Pacific Creek near Farson 500.0 e Oct-54 Sep-73
09215550 Big Sandy River below Farson 1097.0
Jun-81 Present
09216000 Big Sandy River (Creek) below Eden 1610.0 e Oct-54 Jun-81
09216050 Big Sandy River at Gasson Bridge, near Eden 1720.0 e May-72 Present
09216500 Green River at Green River 7970.0 e Oct-14 Sep-39
09216545 Bitter Creek near Bitter Creek 308.0
Jul-75 Sep-81
09216562 Bitter Creek above Salt Wells Creek 836.0
Jun-76 Sep-81
09216565 Salt Wells Creek near South Baxter 34.7
Oct-76 Sep-81
09216578 Dry Canyon Creek near South Baxter 3.7
1976 1980
09216750 Salt Wells Creek near Salt Wells 526.0
Jun-76 Sep-81
09217000 Green River near Green River 14000.0 e Apr-51 Present
Blacks Fork
09217900 Blacks Fork near Robertson 130 e Jul-66
Oct-92
Sep-86
Present
09218500 Blacks Fork near Millburne 152
Oct-39 Sep 98
no winter records since Sep 92
09219000 Blacks Fork near Urie 261
Oct-37 Sep-55
09220000 East Fork of Smith Fork near Robertson 53
Jul-39 Oct 98
no winter records since Oct 71
09220500 West Fork of Smith Fork near Robertson 37.2
Jul-39
May-72
Oct-71
Sep-81
no winter records since Oct 71
09221500 Smith Fork at Mountainview 192
Oct-41 Sep-57
09222000 Blacks Fork near Lyman 821
Oct-37
Jun-62
Sep-57
Sep-83
09222300 Little Muddy Creek near Glencoe 416
Jul-76 Sep-80
09222400 Muddy Creek near Hampton 963
Jul-75 Sep-81
09223000 Hams Fork below Pole Creek near Frontier 128
Oct-52 Present
09223500 Hams Fork near Frontier 298
Oct-45
Apr-72
Oct-71
Sep-72
09224700 Blacks Fork near Little America 3,100 e Jun-62 Present
09225000 Blacks Fork near Green River 3,670 e Oct-47 Jul-62
Henrys Fork
09226000 Henrys Fork near Lonetree 56 e Oct-42
May-72
Oct-71
Sep-72
09226500 Middle Beaver Creek near Lonetree 28 e Oct-48 Sep-70
09227000 East Fork Beaver Creek near Lonetree 8.2 e Oct-48 Sep-62
09227500 West Fork Beaver Creek near Lonetree 23 e Oct-48 Sep-62
09228000 Henrys Fork near Burntfork 242
Oct-42 Sep-54
09228500 Burnt Fork near Burntfork 52.8
Apr-43 Sep-83
09229500 Henrys Fork near Manila 520.0 e Oct-28 Sep-93
Little Snake
09251800 North Fork Little Snake River near Encampment 9.64
Oct-56 Oct-65
09251900 North Fork Little Snake River near Slater, CO 29.3
Apr-56 Sep-63
09253000 Little Snake River near Slater, CO 285
Oct-43
Oct-50
Sep-47
Present
09253400 Battle Creek near Encampment 13
Apr-56
Apr-85
Sep-63
Sep-88
09253500 Battle Creek near Slater, CO

Oct-42 Sep-51
09255000 Slater Fork (Creek) near Slater, CO 161
Jul-31 Present
09255400 East Fork Savery Creek near Encampment 5.57
Apr-56
Apr-85
Sep-58
Sep-88
09255500 Savery Creek at Upper Station, near Savery 200
Oct-40
Oct-52
Sep-41
Sep-71
09256000 Savery Creek near Savery 330
Oct-41
Oct-47
Apr-72
Apr-85
Sep-46
Sep-71
Sep-72
Sep-92
09257000 Little Snake River near Dixon 988
Oct-38
May-72
Sep 71
Sep-97
no winter records since Sep 71
09258000 Willow Creek near Dixon 24 e Oct-53 Sep-93
09259000 Muddy Creek near Baggs 1257 e Oct-87 Sep-91
09259700 Little Snake River near Baggs 3020 e Oct 62 Sep 68
09260000 Little Snake River near Lily, CO 3730 e Oct-21 Present
WWRC Muddy Creek at Snyder's Oil Pad 556
1985 1985
"e" indicates approximate drainage area

Review of Hydrologic Conditions

The reservoir history and availability of gage records led to a preliminary conclusion that 1971-1998 should serve as the study period. Ideally, the modeling study period should be representative of long- term hydrologic conditions in the basin. To analyze this aspect of the proposed study period, annual flows were reviewed for the USGS gage 09188500 Green River at Warren Bridge near Daniel (Figure 1). This gage has the longest record of the Green River basin gages in Wyoming, and as an indicator of long-term versus short-term statistics, is assumed applicable to the entire basin. Characteristics of the long-term (1932-1998, excluding 1993) record and the proposed study period (1971-1998, excluding 1993) are tabulated below:

Table 2 - Characteristics of Annual Flow Series for 091885500 Green River at Warren Bridge near Daniel

1932-1998 (excluding 1993)Record 1971-1998 (excluding 1993) Record
Mean (af) 367,426 368,744
Standard Deviation 82,724 99,929
Three highest years 1986 / 1997 / 1971 1986 / 1997 / 1971
Three highest values (af) 556,150 / 513,080 / 499,510 556,150 / 513,080 / 499,510
Three lowest years 1977 / 1934 / 1992 1977 / 1992 / 1988
Three lowest values (af) 203,260 / 208,720 / 213,910 203,260 / 213,910 / 232,330

The table shows that the means of the two periods are very similar. The standard deviation for the shorter period is higher due to the smaller sample size. Most notably, the short period includes the three highest annual flows of record, as well as two of the three driest. Furthermore, Figure 1 shows that the most enduring drought of record (1987-1992) is captured in the model study period. Usually the concern is that the short period does not include extremes found in the longer record, but in this case, extremes of both wet and dry are clearly included in the proposed study period.

Figure 1. Green River at Warren Bridge, near Daniel, WY
Green River at Warren Bridge, near Daniel, WY

Selected Study Period

Based on available records, existence of reservoirs, and representativeness of the period, 1971-1998 is selected as the modeling study period. This 28-year period, on average, appears similar to long-term conditions, and includes wet, dry and normal years. It would be possible to use a longer study period in the Little Snake sub-basin, but 1971-1998 will be used in this sub-basin as well, for consistency. Conversely, data may prove limiting on Henry's Fork. Gage data will have to be filled (estimated) to draw normal, wet and dry year flows from 1971-1998 on Henry's Fork. It is assumed that adequate regression relationships can be found, but if they cannot, the study period may be modified for the Henry's Fork.

In this evaluation, traditional hydrologic techniques were used to estimate missing data. Typically, this means beginning by looking for a strong linear relationship between data that overlap in time at gages with similar hydrology. The basis of success for this procedure hinges on finding similarity in runoff characteristics between two streams, then using that similarity to "rebuild" missing data values at the deficient gage for the years when no overlap exists. The strength of a linear regression relationship is described by the "coefficient of determination," or r2. This coefficient, derived mathematically through the regression exercise, is a measure of the variability in flow at one gage that can be explained by variability in the other. A perfect relationship would have an r2 = 1.0; imperfect relationships have r2 less than 1.0. Regression of hydrologic data resulting in r2 > 0.7 is often considered strong enough for data estimating, although less strong relationships may be used if no other technique is better.

Index Gage Selection

The objective of this work is to identify gages to be used to identify normal, wet and dry years by ranking of annual flows. The gages selected as representative for this purpose are termed "index" gages. Ultimately, the top (largest annual flow amounts) 20 percent of the years were designated as wet years, the middle 60 percent designated as normal years, and the 20 percent with lowest annual flows designated as dry years. The purpose of this subtask was to select gages for this ranking task that provided coverage of the basin, were relatively free of influence by man's activities, and which were relatively complete during the study period.

Approach

The periods of record for gaging stations listed in Table 1 were reviewed. Gages that were in operation during most, if not all, of the study period were selected for evaluation as index gages. Additionally, if a gage was in operation seasonally throughout the study period, it was included in the evaluation as a potential index gage. Table 3 lists the gages that met these initial screening criteria.

Table 3 - Potential Index Gages for Hydrologic Condition
Basin Gage No. Gage Name
Upper Green River 09188500 Green River at Warren Bridge

09196500 Pine Creek above Fremont Lake

09205000 New Fork River near Big Piney

09209400 Green River near LaBarge

09210500 Fontenelle Creek near Herschler Ranch, near Fontenelle

09211200 Green River below Fontenelle Reservoir

09213500 Big Sandy River near Farson

09216050 Big Sandy River at Gasson Bridge

09217000 Green River near Green River
Blacks Fork River 09218500 Blacks Fork near Millburne

09220000 East Fork Smith Fork near Robertson

09223000 Hams Fork below Pole Creek near Frontier

09224700 Blacks Fork near Little America
Henrys Fork River 09229500 Henrys Fork near Manila
Little Snake River 09253000 Little Snake near Slater, CO

09257000 Little Snake near Dixon

The above list of potential index gages was further narrowed by applying the following criteria:

  1. Were reservoir operations above the gage consistent throughout the study period?

    • 09220000 - East Fork Smith Fork near Robertson - State Line Reservoir was constructed in 1979. Thus the record consists of pre-reservoir flows, flows that were modified by construction activities, and post-reservoir flows.

  2. Which potential index gages have potential index gages located upstream that may be, to a greater degree, free from man's influence?

    • 09205000 - New Fork River near Big Piney
    • 09209400 - Green River near LaBarge
    • 09211200 - Green River below Fontenelle Reservoir
    • 09217000 - Green River near Green River
    • 09224700 - Blacks Fork near Little America
    • 09257000 - Little Snake near Dixon.

  3. When two potential gages are on the same tributary and one has year-round data and the other has seasonal data, discard the gage with seasonal data.

    • 09213500 - Big Sandy River near Farson.

This screening process resulted in eight gages remaining under consideration. Five gages required some adjustment prior to determining the wet, dry and normal years. The required adjustments are described below:

  1. 09188500 - Green River at Warren Bridge, near Daniel

    There were no USGS data available for water year 1993. Provisional data for 1993 were found in Williams thesis (1995) and in HYDRODATA, USGS Daily Values - West I, Volume 8.0 (Hydrosphere, 1996). These data were discarded because winter flows appeared excessive. A linear regression relationship was developed between the annual flow at the Green River near LaBarge gage (09209400) and the annual flow at Green River at Warren Bridge. These gages share an overlapping period of record from October 1963 through September 1998, excluding water year 1993. The relationship is:

    
    Annual Flow at Green River at Warren Bridge  0.2198 x Annual Flow at Green River near 
                                    LaBarge + 106,583				   (1)
                                        r2 = 0.92
    

    This relationship was used to estimate the annual flow at the Green River at Warren Bridge gage for 1993 prior to determining the wettest and driest 20 percent of the study years.

  2. 09196500 - Pine Creek above Fremont Lake

    There are no data for water year 1998. A linear relationship was developed between the annual flow at the New Fork near Big Piney gage and the annual flow at the Pine Creek above Fremont Lake gage using regression techniques. These gages share an overlapping period of record from October 1954 through September 1997. The relationship is:

    
    Annual Flow at Pine Creek above Fremont Lake = 0.16959 x Annual Flow at New Fork 
                                 near Big Piney + 37211.63				  (2)
                                      r2 = 0.91
    

    This relationship was used to estimate the annual flow at the Pine Creek above Fremont Lake gage for 1998 prior to determining the wettest and driest 20 percent of the study years.

  3. 09216000 Big Sandy River below Eden and 09216050 Big Sandy River at Gasson Bridge

    These two gages share an overlapping period of record from May 1972 through July 1981. A linear relationship based upon the monthly flows was determined from the overlapping data:

    
             Flow at Gasson Bridge = 1.0376* Flow below Eden + 722.365		  (3)
                                       r2 = 0.99
    

    This relationship was used to synthesize monthly flow data for the period of October 1970 through April 1972 for the Big Sandy River at Gasson Bridge gage prior to determining the wettest and driest 20 percent of the study years.

  4. 09218500 - Blacks Fork near Millburne

    Only irrigation season flow measurements exist for the 1993-1998 water years. The wettest and driest 20 percent of the study period years were determined from the irrigation season flow measurements for the study period.

  5. 09229500 - Henrys Fork near Manila

    It was originally assumed that the Blacks Fork near Millburne gage would be used as the Index gage for Henrys Fork. Later review of the available historical data for the Henrys Fork near Manila, Utah gage determined that there were sufficient differences between the two basins to warrant the use of this gage as an index gage for Henrys Fork.

    There are no data for water years 1994-1998. A linear regression relationship was developed between the monthly flow at the Blacks Fork near Lyman gage (09222000) and the monthly flow at the Henrys Fork near Manila gage. These gages share an overlapping period of record from October 1937 through September 1957 and June 1962 through September 1983. The relationship is:

    
    Monthly Flow at Henrys Fork near Manila = 0.5412* Monthly Flow at Blacks Fork near 
                                  Lyman + 561.86					(4)
                                      r2 = 0.87
    

    Prior to extending the records for the Henrys Fork near Manila gage, the Blacks Fork near Lyman gage records had to be filled from 1994 through 1998. A linear relationship was developed between the monthly flow at the Blacks Fork near Little America gage (09224700) and the monthly flow at the Blacks Fork near Lyman gage. These gages share an overlapping period of record from June 1962 through September 1983. The relationship is:

    
    Monthly Flow at Blacks Fork near Lyman = 0.4495* Monthly Flow at Blacks Fork near 
                              Little America + 319.43				(5)
                                       r2 = 0.87
    

    The Lyman gage record developed using Equation (5) was supplied as the independent variable in Equation (4) to synthesize monthly data for water years 1994 through 1998 for the Henrys Fork near Manila gage. Note that Equation (4) was based entirely on actual data, but applied to regressed data. Once the Manila gage record was completed through this estimation technique, the wettest and driest 20 percent of the study years were identified.

Results

The wettest and driest 20 percent of the study period years, on an annual basis, were identified for each of the remaining gages. The index gages and corresponding wet and dry year selection are shown in Table 4. There was no exact duplication of hydrologic condition (i.e. wet and dry years did not correspond at all gages all the time), so all seven index gages will be used, applied to geographical areas as follows (see Figure 2):

Table 4 - Wet, Normal, and Dry Years for Green River Basin Index Gages
Wet, Normal, and Dry Years for 
Green River Basin Index Gages

Indicator Gages Resulting From Study Period Selection
click to enlarge

Additional Surface Water Data

As part of this task, all gage data, reservoir content data, and evaporation data required for the Green River basin model were requested from the Water Resources Data System at the University of Wyoming.

Summary

One gage (Green River at Warren Bridge) was evaluated to establish the suitability of using 1971-1998 as the modeling study period. A total of eight gaging stations (listed above) emerged as providing information suitable for determining normal, wet and dry years for the sub-basins in which they were located. Further details regarding the regression analyses and streamflow values are available in the project working papers and in the surface water modeling memorandum.

Additional References

Boyle Engineering Corp, 1998, State Water Planning Process Feasibility Report, prepared for the Wyoming Water Development Commission.