Home Page
News & Information
River Basin Plans
Basin Advisory Groups
Planning Products
|
Water Supply
The unregulated flow of the river, uneven and unpredictable, varies
widely during the year, from year to year, and over long periods of years.
Water supply studies of virgin or undepleted flow at Lee Ferry show
a maximum of 24 million acre-feet per year (maf/yr) in 1924 and a low flow
of 5.5 maf in 1977. The long-term average virgin flow of the river at Lee Ferry,
from the turn of the century to the present, averages 14.7 maf/yr. However,
the bulk of the high flow occurred during the early part of this century so
that the average virgin flow from 1896 to 1930, a "wet" period, was about 17
maf/yr whereas the average virgin flow from 1930 to the present time, a "dry"
period, was about 13 maf/yr. The 10-year wettest period saw an average
annual virgin flow of 18.8maf in 1914-1923. The driest 10 years saw an
average annual flow of 11.8 maf.
Since more accurate measurements of the flow at Lee Ferry were commenced
in 1922, the flows have averaged about 14 maf/yr. This range of flows is
significant. For example, the Compact negotiators in 1922 divided what
was thought to be a water supply of 16 maf/yr between the Upper
and Lower Basins on the assumption that the flows were in excess of
that amount. Since 1922 estimates of the river's flow have steadily been
revised downward to approximately 14 maf. The lower average river flows;
i.e., a shrinking supply coupled with an increasing demand, have
contributed greatly to the water problems that arose in later years.
Early River Development
In the late 1800's developers in the Imperial Valley of California
devised plans to divert water from the Colorado River and to irrigate
Imperial Valley lands by gravity flow. Diversion works were completed
in 1901 for that purpose as a private undertaking. In 1903
80,000 acres were irrigated and in 1920 there were 400,000 irrigated acres.
Today there are 500,000 irrigated acres.
Following notices of appropriations filed in 1877 by Thomas Blythe, diversion
works were also begun by private developers in the Palo Verde Valley in
California. Private canal companies also began irrigation in Arizona as
early as 1890 in the Yuma Valley and in 1905 in the North Gila Valley.
After the passage of the Reclamation Act of 1902, investigations were started
to determine the feasibility of large, Federal irrigation projects. The Yuma
Reclamation Project in Arizona and California was authorized in 1904 and the
first Colorado River water was delivered to it in 1907. By 1920, irrigation
works constructed primarily by private enterprise, especially in the Imperial
knd Palo Verde Valleys of California, had expanded to such an extent that the
unregulated flow of the Colorado River was completely utilized during periods
of low flow that further expansion was dependent upon construction of storage
reservoirs on the river.
The erratic flows of the river, its tendency to destructive flooding and its
high silt load limited its usefulness for a dependable year-round water
supply without some flood control and storage facilities, both of which were
beyond the means of local entities and the States. Before construction
of Hoover Dam, which was completed in 1935, the lower reaches of the
Colorado River, swollen by floodwaters, broke through a cut several miles
below the International Boundary, which had been made by the early developers
of the Imperial Valley in California. For 16 months it flowed into the
fields of the Imperial Valley enlarging the Salton Sea, approximately
490 square miles in area, and threatened to engulf the entire valley.
The break was finally closed largely through the efforts of the
Southern Pacific Railroad Company but only after 30,000 acres of arable
land had been inundated, farms ruined, homes destroyed, highways washed
away, and railroad tracks destroyed. This tragic occurrence, indicating
the need for flood control of the lower Colorado River, became a motivating
reason for the construction of Hoover Dam. That, plus problems in
maintenance of the distribution facilities to Imperial Valley because its
diversions of water were through facilities in Mexico, led to demands for
a canal within the United States.
In 1901 the Davis and Lippincott Report recommended studies of two
major projects which actually materialized in the Boulder Canyon Project
Act, a storage dam at the Boulder Canyon site and a canal from the Colorado
River to the Imperial Valley in California. In 1918, under a contract with
the Imperial Irrigation District, the All-American Canal Board, chaired
by Mr. Meade, recommended legislation which would authorize a high dam for
the storage of Colorado River water and an All- American Canal to Imperial Valley.
This led to the Kincaid Act in 1920 (41 Stat. 600) which authorized the
Secretary of the Interior to make a study of the diversion and use of
Colorado River waters. This resulted in the Fall-Davis Report in 1922,
entitled "Problems of Imperial Valley and Vicinity" (Senate Document No. 142, 67th
Congress, Second Session). The report recommended the All-American
Canal and a storage dam in the Lower Basin, rather than in the Upper Basin,
as the best possible site for flood control, storage, and a power development
nearest to the markets for power in Southern California. Its data were
also used by the negotiators of the Colorado River Compact. The Fall-Davis
Report stated that the Colorado River problems"... are of such magnitude
as to be beyond the reach of other than a national solution." And, finally,
in 1924, the Weymouth Report spelled out the details of what soon became
the Boulder Canyon Project.
|